Systems Admin, Mac Geek, Network Nerd, Developer
922 stories
·
16 followers

Apple Turnover

2 Comments and 4 Shares
An upside-down Apple logo on a platinum background

Mac users of a certain age may remember Ambrosia Software, maker of iconic shareware hits like Maelstrom and Escape Velocity. For over a decade, the Ambrosia website included this quotation on its homepage:

Virtue does not come from money, but rather from virtue comes money, and all other things good to man.―Socrates

In other words, don’t try to make money. Try to make great things, and the money will surely follow. It’s a strategy that’s simple to explain, but almost impossible for any company to follow.

Folks in the C-suite will try to tell you that these two goals are perfectly aligned—that making great products is part of being a profitable company. But they mean it in the same way that Frosted Flakes is part of a complete breakfast. It’s on the table, sure…along with a glass of milk, a poached egg, toast with jam, and a piece of fruit. It turns out that, as far as big corporations are concerned, one part of this spread is actually kind of optional.

From virtue comes money, and all other good things. This idea rings in my head whenever I think about Apple. It’s the most succinct explanation of what pulled Apple from the brink of bankruptcy in the 1990s to its astronomical success today. Don’t try to make money. Try to make a dent in the universe. Do that, and the money will take care of itself.

Turn, Turn, Turn

Dissatisfaction with Apple among its most ardent fans has, at various times, reached a crescendo that has included public demands for a change in leadership. The precipitating events could be as serious as Apple bowing to pressure from an authoritarian regime, or as trivial as releasing an unsatisfying new version of an application or operating system.

Despite making my living by criticizing Apple, I tend not to get caught up in the controversy of the moment. When Apple ruined its laptop keyboards, I wasn’t calling for Tim Cook’s head. I just wanted them to fix the keyboards. And they did (eventually).

But success hides problems, and even the best company can lose its way. To everything, there is a season.

As far as I’m concerned, the only truly mortal sin for Apple’s leadership is losing sight of the proper relationship between product virtue and financial success—and not just momentarily, but constitutionally, intransigently, for years. Sadly, I believe this has happened.

The preponderance of the evidence is undeniable. Too many times, in too many ways, over too many years, Apple has made decisions that do not make its products better, all in service of control, leverage, protection, profits—all in service of money.

To be clear, I don’t mean things like charging exorbitant prices for RAM and SSD upgrades on Macs or taking too high a percentage of in-app purchases in the App Store. Those are venial sins. It’s the apparently unshakable core beliefs that motivate these and other poor decisions that run counter to the virtuous cycle that led Apple out of the darkness all those years ago.

Apple, as embodied by its leadership’s decisions over the past decade or more, no longer seems primarily motivated by the creation of great products. Time and time again, its policies have made its products worse for customers in exchange for more power, control, and, yes, money for Apple.

The iPhone is a better product when people can buy ebooks within the Kindle app. And yet Apple has fought this feature for the past fourteen years, to the tune of millions of dollars in legal fees, and has only relented due to a recent court order (which they continue to appeal).

In the (Apple-mandated) absence of competition in the realms of app sales, payment processing, customer service, and software business models, Apple’s exclusive offerings in these areas have stagnated for years. What should be motivating Apple to make improvements—the desire to make great products—seems absent. What should not be motivating Apple—the desire for power, control, and profits—seems omnipresent.

And I don’t mean that in a small way; I mean that in a big way. Every new thing we learn about Apple’s internal deliberations surrounding these decisions only lends more weight to the conclusion that Apple has lost its north star. Or, rather, it has replaced it with a new, dark star. And time and again, we’ve learned that these decisions go all the way to the top.

The best leaders can change their minds in response to new information. The best leaders can be persuaded. But we’ve had decades of strife, lawsuits, and regulations, and Apple has stubbornly dug in its heels even further at every turn. It seems clear that there’s only one way to get a different result.

In every healthy entity, whether it’s an organization, an institution, or an organism, the old is replaced by the new: CEOs, sovereigns, or cells. It’s time for new leadership at Apple. The road we’re on now does not lead anywhere good for Apple or its customers. It’s springtime, and I’m choosing to believe in new life. I swear it’s not too late.


For more on this topic, see the follow-up article: Apple Turnaround

Read the whole story
peelman
2 days ago
reply
Sadly, i dont see this as a situation unique to Apple.

Google, Meta, X, basically the entire Valley, is a fucking cesspool of toxic money.

and hilariously, Microsoft, Sony, and a few others who aren’t mired in that toxic environment, who used to be the mortal enemy and seen as the barriers to progress and the largest threats to the technology’s potential, are now the ones who have taken up the banner and become the protagonists (admittedly mostly for self preservation) and are doing the altruistic things, while making what money they can. that isn’t to say they are immune for mistakes or gross behavior, much like John’s point about RAM and disk prices at apple, only that they have become the underdogs, the keel, not the rudder, dutifully keeping the ship upright while others attempt to steer it into the rocks.
Seymour, Indiana
fxer
15 days ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete
1 public comment
sirshannon
15 days ago
reply
I wish I was optimistic.

Microsoft Supports Epic Against Apple’s Appeal

1 Comment

Tom Warren:

A year ago Xbox president Sarah Bond revealed that Microsoft was planning to launch a new Xbox mobile web store in July 2024. That never happened. I’ve been wondering what the hold up has been over the past year, and it seems we might have an answer: Apple.

Microsoft filed an amicus brief late on Tuesday, in support of Epic Games’ ongoing fight with Apple’s control over the App Store. The brief takes issue with Apple’s attempt to overturn the injunction that allows Epic and other developers to freely advertise alternative payment methods in their apps, and not have to pay Apple additional fees for purchases made outside of apps.

Microsoft:

Prior to the district court’s most recent order, Microsoft had been unable to implement linked-out payments (or even inform customers that alternative purchase methods exist) because of Apple’s new anti-steering policies that restrict Microsoft’s communication to users and impose an even higher economic cost to Microsoft than before the injunction.

[…]

Similarly, Microsoft has long sought to enable Xbox app users on iOS to both buy and stream games in the app from the cloud or their other devices. Apple’s policies have restricted Microsoft’s ability to offer these functionalities together; the injunction allows Microsoft to explore this possibility.

Previously:

Read the whole story
peelman
4 days ago
reply
Apple is going to lose, and lose big here. you can not like Epic, but Apple is screwing so many folks out of so much money, that when (not if) Epic wins, the dominos will begin to fall.
Seymour, Indiana
Share this story
Delete

Synology Hard Drive Locking

1 Comment

Patrick Kennedy (via Hacker News):

According to HardwareLuxx, Synology is on a rough course with generations-old sub-par NAS hardware and now appears to be locking its NAS units to its own branded hard drives in its upcoming 2025 Plus models. This is a shame since a few years ago, Synology had neat hardware.

[…]

Without scale, and a library of patents, it is a very hard market to enter. As a result, Synology must be simply re-branding drives. Labeling drives as a “Dell”, “NetApp”, “HPE”, or other big vendor drive has been going on for years (decades?) on both the hard drive and SSD sides of storage.

[…]

Let us just call this what it is. It is a grab for extra margin dollars. The challenge is that it is bad for Synology’s customers. For example, the Synology Plus series only scales to 16TB currently with the HAT3310-16T. Synology’s enterprise series scales to 20TB. WD Red Pro drives are already pushing 26TB.

[…]

When a drive fails, one of the key factors in data security is how fast an array can be rebuilt into a healthy status. Of course, Amazon is just one vendor, but they have the distribution to do same-day and early morning overnight parts to a large portion of the US.

[…]

Additionally, there can also be concerns about drive availability in the long-term. If your NAS is vendor-locked to only use Synology drives, then as owner of that NAS you are fully dependent upon Synology’s survival as a company and that they would continue manufacturing drives in the capacity points that you want.

Kevin Purdy:

Popular NAS-maker Synology has confirmed and slightly clarified a policy that appeared on its German website earlier this week: Its “Plus” tier of devices, starting with the 2025 series, will require Synology-branded hard drives for full compatibility, at least at first.

“Synology-branded drives will be needed for use in the newly announced Plus series, with plans to update the Product Compatibility List as additional drives can be thoroughly vetted in Synology systems,” a Synology representative told Ars by email. “Extensive internal testing has shown that drives that follow a rigorous validation process when paired with Synology systems are at less risk of drive failure and ongoing compatibility issues.”

[…]

As previously noted by the German press release, Synology Plus models purchased prior to the 2025 series will continue to support third-party drives at their current level.

Rui Carmo:

I’ve been a very happy Synology customer for over 15 years, but this piece of news (which echoes the Western Digital fracas from a couple of years ago) makes me wonder if I will keep recommending them.

Casey Liss:

I think my appreciation for a product crosses the rubicon into love when it regularly and repeatedly demonstrates one trait: respect for the user.

[…]

I’m not sure if I was more of a fan of Synology or Sonos, but suffice it to say, I was a superfan of both. I just replaced my original Synology last year, and I’m sad to say that the one I just got is likely to be my last.

He kind of walks this back after discussion on Accidental Tech Podcast, where it’s suggested that he should just consider the extra cost per drive as part of the total price. He has no problem paying a bit more for other premium products that he loves, so why should this be different? But I think it is different because:

  • At minimum, it seems like Synology is trying to hide the price increase rather than being forthright.

  • It seems like the purported benefits of Synology-branded drives are either very minimal or entirely fake. There are no specifics given, and existing third-party drives are still supported. Is this just FUD?

  • Money aside, the branded drives may not be available in the same capacities or with the same shipping speed. If you keep a bunch of blank drives on hand for other purposes, or if you want to repurpose an existing drive for use in the Synology, that will no longer be possible.

Eric Schwarz:

While I usually enjoy the discussion on the show, it felt a bit dismissive that his concerns were met with the sentiment that these companies have moved on to a different target audience that isn’t him. While that may be true in some instances, the examples he cites (Eero, Sonos, and Synology) aren’t really making big shifts.

[…]

I found Synology’s move away from third-party drive support equally disheartening as this feels like a “fix” for a problem most people never encountered. Even if Synology is going more towards the enterprise market, no one is cross-shopping a 2-bay compact NAS with a massive rack-mount unit. In my time in higher education IT where every dollar matters, I’ve also found that the various DS-21X models were great for one-off installations and we could use any of the extra drives we had on-hand (I ran a personal DS-216+II with a run-of-the-mill Seagate drive I pulled from a dead enclosure for way longer than I probably should’ve, but it was fine). While there might be some instances where having fully-supported equipment makes sense, hard drives are such an established technology that the concerns of compatibility feel a bit manufactured. At the very least, offer an advanced mode to run things in an unsupported manner for enthusiasts.

See also: Mac Power Users.

Previously:

Read the whole story
peelman
27 days ago
reply
i turned up two new Synology Rackstations last year, and just turned up two new QNAPS this year. between the shit experience i had with the Synologies last year, they are effectively dead to me.
Seymour, Indiana
Share this story
Delete

Is Electron Really That Bad?

1 Comment

Federico Viticci (Mastodon):

I’ve been thinking about this video by Theo Browne for the past few days, especially in the aftermath of my story about working on the iPad and realizing its best apps are actually web apps.

I think Theo did a great job contextualizing the history of Electron and how we got to this point where the majority of desktop apps are built with it. There are two sections of the video that stood out to me and I want to highlight here. First, this observation – which I strongly agree with – regarding the desktop apps we ended up having thanks to Electron and why we often consider them “buggy”[…]

[…]

As documented in the thread from late 2023, this is a common issue for the majority of AI clients built with SwiftUI, which is often less efficient than Electron when it comes to rendering real-time chat messages. Ironic.

Isaiah Carew:

i think the weirdest part of this article is hearing that chromium is more efficient than SwiftUI.

is that just for specific things or is it across the board?

Miguel Arroz:

[It] seems they’re talking about text rendering. SwiftUI is really bad at that, this is why I’m using UIKit for the document editor in PaperVault.

It’s not really surprising that Chromium is super optimized for rendering Web text. On the other hand, that’s a common thing that apps need to do, so it would be good to have a better native story.

Christina Warren:

For years, I’ve wanted to write a post called “The web won” which is very similar to what @viticci wrote here -- my aim was desktop more than mobile, but this is also especially true on the iPad and to @isaiah’s point, what makes this worse on mobile/iPad is the state of PWAs in Safari/WebKit.

Peter Steinberger:

Man I’m so happy I am in JavaScript land. Debugging just works and compile times are instant.

When I started writing apps, the availability and quality of developer tools was considered to be an advantage for native development vs. the Web. These days, I still think native APIs usually lead to better apps—though there are some awful Catalyst and SwiftUI apps that would have been better as Electron—but the Web tooling has really improved. I think many would now consider it a strong advantage.

JavaScript got 25+ years of work from many different parties. Mac developers got Swift, which I generally like and much prefer to JavaScript. But, while JavaScript is gaining many of the benefits of other systems, while retaining its dynamism, Apple is forfeiting former strengths. Swift made compilation much slower. Debugging is still slow and arguably worse than before. There are more compiler and linking bugs. There’s no more Fix and Continue. SwiftUI is more opaque than Cocoa.

Web technologies also seem to provide a more stable development target—do you hear about Web developers planning their year around seasonal beta testing and breakage?—and better documentation. An integrated development stack would seem to offer potential advantages, but offsetting that on the Web side are open source, cross-platform, distribution outside the App Store, and legions of developers and companies, now getting multiplied by AI.

Previously:

Read the whole story
peelman
30 days ago
reply
Mike missed the biggest thing going for it: standards that are published to evolve. not be randomly deprecated because a neckbeard noticed the intern wrote shite code 5 years ago and now wants to throw the entire API away.

the web is DRENCHED in technical debt that is whitewashed by web browsers and interpreters via mountains of their own technical debt that comes home to roost in horrible ways every so often.

Nerds demand progress, but hate change, just like the rest of the world. they want THEIR problems fixed, just don’t move their cheese while you do it. if you asked anybody what the future was in 2006 it would have been a faster blackberry or a bigger ipod.

it isn’t Apple’s job to make this shit easy. they make it POSSIBLE. and i won’t argue that they could do a better job of even that low bar. same with every other standards body or developer out there.
Seymour, Indiana
Share this story
Delete

Fantastical 4.0.7

1 Comment

Flexibits:

Multiple Windows! See your schedule from different views or dates at the same time. Open new windows at File > New Window

Finally. The main use case for me is to compare the same month for different years. I have been doing this by opening one of them using the macOS Calendar app, but it will nice to be able to use Fantastical for both.

Previously:

Read the whole story
peelman
62 days ago
reply
i used Fanstastical until i couldn’t take it any more. not being able to quickly turn on individual calendars (without resorting to their kludgy and over blown groups) finally became a deal breaker, especially after Calendar caught up with the only other functions of Fantatical i cared about (natural language adds, multiple alarms, travel time, etc).

And when i need to look at my company’s vacation calendar or on-call calendar compared against my own various calendars, i don’t have to go create a venn diagram group unique to that endeavor.
Seymour, Indiana
Share this story
Delete

There are no Rainchecks for Sold-Out Tool Deals

1 Comment
Home Depot Doorbuster Cordless Power Tool Deals from Black Friday 2023

Someone wrote in today, complaining that they couldn’t get in on a tool deal at Home Depot.

Confusingly, they left the comment on a post for a tool deal that’s still widely available in stores and online with free shipping.

Here’s what they said:

DO NOT buy Milwaukee tools from Home Depot. What Home Depot don’t tell you is when they have tools on sale and they run out of stock with sale still on they will not honor sale price when is becomes available, no rain checks. they do not advertise this.

There are no rainchecks for tool deals.

I think I read somewhere that some supermarkets still do rainchecks. But for tool deals, especially Black Friday deals and holiday promos, no, there are no rainchecks.

Let’s say your local supermarket was advertising bananas for 19 cents a pound, but they sold out of bananas. If you went to customer service and asked for a raincheck, they’d write out a slip that allowed you to get bananas at 19 cents a pound at a later time. Frankly, I don’t know if they’ll still do that.

If you go to Home Depot and ask for a raincheck on a tool deal that they sold out of, you’re not going to get one. The same is true at Lowe’s. Or at least I’ve never heard of anyone successfully asking for and getting a raincheck at either retailer.

Best Buy No Rainchecks Holiday 2024

Some retailers still kind of offer rainchecks, but not all the time. If you shop BestBuy’s holiday deals, you’ll specifically see that they say “no rainchecks.”

Rainchecks are a relic from long-ago.

It’d be nice if you could get rainchecks on doorbuster deals and similar, but getting on any deals these days seem to be first-come, first-served.

Stores will usually go to lengths to ensure they have some products available for advertised sales, but legally they are not required to honor promotional prices for everyone that wants one.

When a deal sells out, you’re out of luck. Leaving comments across the internet in an attempt to cancel a brand or retailer isn’t going to change that.

Read the whole story
peelman
168 days ago
reply
Rarely does a week go by that i don’t have an “OK Boomer” moment.
Seymour, Indiana
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories